Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AS Watson BeneluxAS Watson Benelux
VS
GPAGPA
AS Watson Benelux

AS Watson Benelux

Nijborg 17, Renswoude, undefined, 3927 DA, NL

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile

AS Watson Benelux is onderdeel van de AS Watson Group. De AS Watson Group is werelds grootste internationale health & beauty retailer. Met 16.800 winkels onder 12 retailmerken in 30 markten, met ruim 130.000 medewerkers wereldwijd. Voor het fiscale jaar 2023 boekte AS W...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,081
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GPA

GPA

Avenida Brigadeiro Luís Antônio 3172, São Paulo, 01402000, BR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gpabr.com
814/1000Good

We are one of the largest food retail companies in Brazil. We were pioneers with a multi-format and multi-channel business model that brings together renowned chains and brands such as Pão de Açúcar and Extra, Minuto Pão de Açúcar, Pão de Açúcar Fresh and Mini Extra. In...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:25,350
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AS Watson Benelux

AS Watson Benelux

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GPA

GPA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AS Watson Benelux in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AS Watson Benelux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AS Watson Benelux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AS Watson Benelux

AS Watson Benelux

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GPA

GPA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AS Watson Benelux company and GPA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AS Watson Benelux and GPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AS Watson Benelux and GPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AS Watson Benelux or GPA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AS Watson Benelux or GPA ?
Between AS Watson Benelux and GPA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AS Watson Benelux and GPA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19756
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Dromara lamp-cloud up to 5.10.0. This affects an unknown part of the file DefGenProjectController.java of the component Code Generator. Such manipulation of the argument outputDir/parent/projectPrefix leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-19753
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in Model Context Protocol mcp-rdf-explorer 1.0.0. Affected is the function explore_url of the file src/mcp-rdf-explorer/server.py of the component MCP Server. Performing a manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73843
SUMMARY

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. Prior to 1.0.2 and 1.1.2, internal/cluster-gateway/server.go served caller-facing management APIs on the externally reachable agent listener without authentication, allowing network-reachable attackers to invoke /api/proxy/ and /api/exec/ operations, proxy the data-plane Kubernetes API, and execute commands in workload pods in multi-cluster deployments. This issue is fixed in versions 1.0.2 and 1.1.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-73842
SUMMARY

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. Prior to 1.0.3, 1.1.3, and 1.2.0-rc.2, internal/cluster-gateway/server.go exposed /api/proxy/, /api/exec/, and /api/wirelogs/ on an internal listener without requiring a client certificate or token, allowing any network-reachable caller to read tenant Kubernetes Secrets, mutate workloads, and execute commands across connected data planes. This issue is fixed in versions 1.0.3, 1.1.3, and 1.2.0-rc.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-73841
SUMMARY

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. From 1.2.0-rc.1 until 1.2.0, internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/exec.go and internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/wirelogs.go authorize component:exec and wirelogs:view using the caller-supplied project query parameter instead of comp.Spec.Owner.ProjectName, allowing a user with a project-scoped grant to execute commands in and read wirelogs from components owned by other projects in the same namespace. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8