Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AstraZenecaAstraZeneca
VS
Johnson & Johnson Innovative MedicineJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca

1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, GB

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.astrazeneca.com
786/1000Fair

We're transforming the future of healthcare by unlocking the power of what science can do for people, society and the planet. For more information, visit www.astrazeneca.com. Community Guidelines: bit.ly/2MgAcio

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:78,683
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

N/A

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
807/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, we innovate with purpose, to lead where medicine is going. The experiences of patients around the world inform and inspire our science-based innovations, which continue to change and save lives. Applying rigorous science with co...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:37,729
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AstraZeneca has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AstraZeneca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AstraZeneca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AST1774045431
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AST-TESHE1773679185
🔒 Incident : Breach
AST2255131222
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AstraZeneca company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine ?
Between AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA