Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

asrec - a Keywords studioasrec - a Keywords studio
VS
Propio Language ServicesPropio Language Services
asrec - a Keywords studio

asrec - a Keywords studio

20, rue de la Folie-Méricourt, paris, undefined, 75011, FR

Last Update: 14/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asrecteam.com
749/1000Moderate

asrec is a French, Paris-based, localization company. We provide translation, adaptation and audio recording services for video games in several languages.

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

4950 College Blvd, Overland Park, Kansas, US, 66211

Last Update: 25/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.propio.com/
719/1000Moderate

Language Access, Driven by Innovation. We believe our technology-forward commitment allows us to offer a full suite of over-the-phone, video remote, in-person interpreting, translation and localization services. Our services provide Limited English Proficient speakers...

NAICS:54193
NAICS Definition:Translation and Interpretation Services
Employees:11,597
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
asrec - a Keywords studio

asrec - a Keywords studio

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Translation and Localization Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for asrec - a Keywords studio in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Translation and Localization Industry Avg (This Year)

Propio Language Services has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - asrec - a Keywords studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

asrec - a Keywords studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Propio Language Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Propio Language Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
asrec - a Keywords studio

asrec - a Keywords studio

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO1787632254

FAQ

Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio and Propio Language Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio and Propio Language Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - asrec - a Keywords studio or Propio Language Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - asrec - a Keywords studio or Propio Language Services ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio and Propio Language Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between asrec - a Keywords studio and Propio Language Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85456
SUMMARY

MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-85455
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85454
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-85453
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-85452
SUMMARY

MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8