Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ASPEED TechnologyASPEED Technology
VS
AMDAMD
ASPEED Technology

ASPEED Technology

4F., No. 1, Sec. 3, Gongdao 5th Rd., Hsinchu, TW, 300

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Founded in 2004, ASPEED Technology is a leading provider of innovative SoC solutions. In 2016, the company acquired Broadcom’s Emulex Pilot™ server remote management chip business, establishing itself as the world’s top supplier of remote server management SoCs. ASPEED...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:55
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
AMD

AMD

2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 01/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amd.com
782/1000Fair

We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technology to enrich our industry, our communities, and the world. Our mission is to build great products that accelerate next-generation computing experiences – the building blocks for the data center, artificial intelli...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:47,977
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ASPEED Technology

ASPEED Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AMD

AMD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

ASPEED Technology has 59.02% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AMD has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ASPEED Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASPEED Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AMD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ASPEED Technology

ASPEED Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
BLEASP1785349499
AMD

AMD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMDLIN1783614518
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1781267811
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1932419101425

FAQ

Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ASPEED Technology company and AMD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ASPEED Technology and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ASPEED Technology and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ASPEED Technology or AMD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ASPEED Technology or AMD ?
Between ASPEED Technology and AMD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ASPEED Technology and AMD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9