Comparison Overview

Asiana Airlines

VS

Cathay Pacific

Asiana Airlines

Asiana Town, Gangseo-Gu, 157-713, KR
Last Update: 2025-12-25
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://flyasiana.com

(Overview) Asiana Airlines is an airline based in Seoul, Korea. As a member of the Star Alliance, Asiana operates over 90 routes to 77 cities in 21 countries worldwide. (Mission) Fullfilling customer satisfaction by providing the best in safety, services, and comfort to the body and mind while traveling – Asiana Airlines pursues these values in the name of excellent service and safety. Aiming to become the world’s best carrier, Asiana Airlines realizes the importance of high growth and revenue thorough Customer Satisfaction Management. Asiana’s beautiful take-off towards the future continues.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,269
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Cathay Pacific

Cathay City, Chek Lap Kok, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cathaypacific.com

Welcome to the official Cathay Pacific LinkedIn page. We have over 200 destinations in our global network, but want to do more than just move you from A to B. We want to take you further in your journey, and ultimately, to move beyond. And we’re here to do what we can to help you discover what’s next. For flight and related enquiries, please contact us via WhatsApp (+852 2747 2747). For other feedback or a formal response, please fill out the form at https://bit.ly/3N7e3BM.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 14,820
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiana-airlines.jpeg
Asiana Airlines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cathay-pacific.jpeg
Cathay Pacific
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asiana Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cathay Pacific
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Asiana Airlines has 58.73% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cathay Pacific in 2025.

Incident History — Asiana Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asiana Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cathay Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cathay Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asiana-airlines.jpeg
Asiana Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to overseas server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cathay-pacific.jpeg
Cathay Pacific
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cathay Pacific company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asiana Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Asiana Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cathay Pacific company has not reported any.

In the current year, Asiana Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than Cathay Pacific company.

Neither Cathay Pacific company nor Asiana Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Asiana Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cathay Pacific company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cathay Pacific company nor Asiana Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asiana Airlines company nor Cathay Pacific company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cathay Pacific company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Asiana Airlines company.

Cathay Pacific company employs more people globally than Asiana Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asiana Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Published
Date
2025-12-24
Updated
Date
2025-12-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References