Comparison Overview
ASEM S.r.l.

ASEM S.r.l.
Via Buia, 4, Artegna, 33011, IT
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Founded in 1979, ASEM has actively lived through the entire evolution of information and digital technologies, constantly anticipating market changes and maturing an important heritage of skills. A leader in Italy in the IPC market, ASEM has long been a key player in th...

Bosch Rexroth
Maria-Theresien-Straße 23, Lohr am Main, 97816, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Bosch Rexroth is a leading provider of automation solutions for industrial and mobile applications. Our innovative products and services enable our customers to move everything that needs to be moved with ease and efficiency, helping them to win in their respective indu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ASEM S.r.l.







Bosch Rexroth






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ASEM S.r.l. in 2026.
Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bosch Rexroth in 2026.
Incident History - ASEM S.r.l. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ASEM S.r.l. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bosch Rexroth (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bosch Rexroth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ASEM S.r.l.

Bosch Rexroth
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.