Comparison Overview
Ascott Australia

Ascott Australia
390 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, AU
Last Update: 19/08/2026
The Ascott Limited Australia is a hospitality group that has 8 properties across Melbourne, Sydney, Hobart, Brisbane and Perth giving employment to around 150 employees. The company’s serviced residence & hotel brands include Ascott, Citadines, Somerset, Quest Apartmen...

Landry's
1510 West Loop South, Houston, 77027, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Landry's is a multinational, diversified restaurant, hospitality, gaming, and entertainment leader based in Houston, Texas. The company operates more than 600 establishments around the world, including well-known concepts, such as Landry’s Seafood House, Bubba Gump S...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Ascott Australia







Landry's






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
Ascott Australia has 34.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Landry's in 2026.
Incident History - Ascott Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ascott Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Landry's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Landry's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Ascott Australia

Landry's
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.