Comparison Overview

Ascom

VS

TransUnion

Ascom

Ascom Holding AG, Zugerstrasse 32, Baar, ZG, CH, 6340
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.ascom.com

Our vision is a world where the right information moves people forward. Our mission is to put the right information in the right hands at the right time so that people can make the best possible decisions. We are a global provider of communication and collaboration solutions for the acute care, long-term care and enterprise sectors. Our solutions are based on intelligent integrations with software and hardware that are open source and compatible with third party solutions. Every single second, our systems generate large amounts of data, which we then turn into useful and actionable information. This helps us to bring data to life for people in the toughest operational environments, ensuring smooth, complete, and efficient workflows. Ascom is headquartered in Baar (Switzerland), has operating businesses in 19 countries and employs around 1,400 people worldwide. Ascom registered shares (ASCN) are listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange in Zurich.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 1,549
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

TransUnion

None, None, Chicago, Illinois, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549
http://www.transunion.com

TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing an actionable picture of each person so they can be reliably represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can transact with confidence and achieve great things. This picture is grounded in our legacy as a credit reporting agency which enables us to tap into both credit and public record data; our data fusion methodology that helps us link, match and tap into the awesome combined power of that data; and our knowledgeable and passionate team, who stewards the information with expertise, and in accordance with local legislation around the world. A leading presence in more than 30 countries across five continents, TransUnion provides solutions that help create economic opportunity, great experiences and personal empowerment for hundreds of millions of people. We call this Information for Good® — it’s our purpose, and what drives us every day. Contact Us Customer support: https://transu.co/60024D64I Business support: https://transu.co/60044D67G

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,441
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascom.jpeg
Ascom
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transunion.jpeg
TransUnion
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ascom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TransUnion
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Ascom has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

TransUnion has 173.97% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Ascom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TransUnion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TransUnion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascom.jpeg
Ascom
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Server Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transunion.jpeg
TransUnion
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Application Exploitation, OAuth Abuse, Malicious Integrations
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion, Financial Gain, Data Exfiltration for Underground Sales
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ascom company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TransUnion company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TransUnion company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Ascom company.

In the current year, TransUnion company has reported more cyber incidents than Ascom company.

Neither TransUnion company nor Ascom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both TransUnion company and Ascom company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither TransUnion company nor Ascom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ascom company nor TransUnion company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TransUnion company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ascom company.

TransUnion company employs more people globally than Ascom company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ascom nor TransUnion holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References