Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.
VS
Burns & McDonnellBurns & McDonnell
Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.

Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.

Avda. 11 de Septiembre 1901, piso 14, Providencia Santiago, undefined, undefined, CL

Last Update: 24/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cl.schindler.com
753/1000Fair

Schindler's presence in Chile covers the last 97 years being, therefore the oldest and most reliable company of its class in the country. The initial equipment was first installed back in 1915, in the area next to the port of Valparaíso by the representative at that t...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:282
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burnsmcd.com
783/1000Fair

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,385
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.

Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.

Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. or Burns & McDonnell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. or Burns & McDonnell ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ascensores Schindler (Chile) S.A. and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2