Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ascension Seton Cedar ParkAscension Seton Cedar Park
VS
Mayo ClinicMayo Clinic
Ascension Seton Cedar Park

Ascension Seton Cedar Park

1401 Medical Parkway, Cedar Park, Texas, US, 78613

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY202...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:437
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

200 First St. S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, US, 55905

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mayoclinic.org
718/1000Moderate

Mayo Clinic has expanded and changed in many ways, but our values remain true to the vision of our founders. Our primary value – The needs of the patient come first – guides our plans and decisions as we create the future of health care. Join us and you'll find a cultur...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:47,611
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ascension Seton Cedar Park

Ascension Seton Cedar Park

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ascension Seton Cedar Park in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Mayo Clinic has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ascension Seton Cedar Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension Seton Cedar Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mayo Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mayo Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ascension Seton Cedar Park

Ascension Seton Cedar Park

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAYSOLHONBAS1770310511
🔒 Incident : Breach
XSOHONADVMAY1780958028

FAQ

Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park company and Mayo Clinic company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park and Mayo Clinic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park and Mayo Clinic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ascension Seton Cedar Park or Mayo Clinic ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ascension Seton Cedar Park or Mayo Clinic ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park and Mayo Clinic, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ascension Seton Cedar Park and Mayo Clinic, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2