Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ascension LivingAscension Living
VS
UHSUHS
Ascension Living

Ascension Living

N/A

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ascensionliving.org/
763/1000Fair

Ascension Living is one of the largest not-for-profit senior living providers in the country. With more than 50+ senior living communities in 12 states and the District of Columbia, our communities are continually developing and adopting new best practices in care that ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:341
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UHS

UHS

367 S Gulph Rd, King of Prussia, 19406, US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.uhs.com
543/1000Critical

One of the nation’s largest and most respected providers of hospital and healthcare services, Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE: UHS) has built an impressive record of achievement and performance, growing since its inception into a Fortune 300 corporation. Headquart...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,391
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ascension Living

Ascension Living

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UHS

UHS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ascension Living in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UHS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ascension Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UHS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UHS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ascension Living

Ascension Living

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UHS

UHS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UHS1790180828
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UHS8515124
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UHSCHAUNI1774542502

FAQ

Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ascension Living company and UHS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ascension Living and UHS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ascension Living and UHS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ascension Living or UHS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ascension Living or UHS ?
Between Ascension Living and UHS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ascension Living and UHS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA