Ascendum Group Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ASC3912339112625)
The Rankiteo video explains how the company Ascendum Group has been impacted by a Breach on the date May 01, 2023.
Incident Summary
If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.
Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Ascendum Group's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteoโs incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Ascendum Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteoโs MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ascendum Group breach identified under incident ID ASC3912339112625.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ascendum Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ascendumgroup, the number of followers: 7857, the industry type: Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 823 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 694 with a difference of -55 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ascendum Group and their customers.
On 27 May 2023, Ascendum Machinery disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Ascendum Machinery $300,000 Data Breach Settlement".
Current and former employees of Ascendum Machinery had their personal information compromised in a May 2023 data breach.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names and Social Security numbers, plus an estimated financial loss of {'settlement_amount': '$300,000', 'attorneys_fees': 'Up to $200,000', 'class_representative_award': 'Up to $5,000', 'claimant_payouts': {'extraordinary_losses': 'Up to $3,000 per claimant', 'ordinary_losses': 'Up to $750 per claimant (including $100 for lost time)', 'alternative_cash_payment': '$40 per claimant'}, 'credit_monitoring_cost': 'Determined by number of claims filed'}.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice sent to affected individuals; class action settlement process established.
The case underscores how Settled via class action lawsuit; claims processing ongoing until Jan. 15, 2026, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notice sent to affected employees; settlement administrator established for claims.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating alleged failure to adequately protect personal information (implies compromised credentials). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating names and Social Security numbers compromised in breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Likely (data exposed in breach). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware mentioned, but PII exposure caused financial/legal impact and Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating $300,000 settlement and identity theft risk imply misuse of exposed PII. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources
- Ascendum Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: http://www.rankiteo.com/company/ascendumgroup/incident/ASC3912339112625
- Ascendum Group CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ascendumgroup
- Ascendum Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/asc3912339112625-ascendum-machinery-breach-may-2023/
- Ascendum Group CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ascendumgroup/history
- Ascendum Group CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/settlements/ascendum-data-settlement
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/static/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf






