Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ASARCOASARCO
VS
Norsk HydroNorsk Hydro
ASARCO

ASARCO

1365 W Pima Mine Rd, Sahuarita, 85629, US

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.asarco.com
721/1000Moderate

Grupo Mexico is a transnational mining company with operations in the U.S., Mexico and Peru. ASARCO (American Smelting and Refining Company), the U.S. based subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, is an integrated copper mining, smelting and refining company with approximately 1,70...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:1,138
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Drammensveien 264, Oslo, Oslo, NO, 0283

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.hydro.com
658/1000Weak

Hydro is a leading industrial company that builds businesses and partnerships for a more sustainable future. We develop industries that matter to people and society. Since 1905, Hydro has turned natural resources into valuable products for people and businesses, creati...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:13,095
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ASARCO

ASARCO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASARCO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norsk Hydro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ASARCO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASARCO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Norsk Hydro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norsk Hydro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ASARCO

ASARCO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASA211072525
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOR442050724
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR416051424
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR5602456091025

FAQ

Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ASARCO company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ASARCO and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ASARCO and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ASARCO or Norsk Hydro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ASARCO or Norsk Hydro ?
Between ASARCO and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ASARCO and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9