Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Asahi Kasei BioprocessAsahi Kasei Bioprocess
VS
Danaher CorporationDanaher Corporation
Asahi Kasei Bioprocess

Asahi Kasei Bioprocess

1-1-2 Yurakucho, Chiyoda-ku, 100-0006, JP

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ak-bio.com
758/1000Fair

【About Us】 Asahi Kasei Bioprocess, a division of Asahi Kasei Life Science, supplies innovative bioprocessing tools and services that enhance the safety, manufacturing efficiency, and purity of modern biotherapeutics and pharmaceuticals. With offerings in purification, f...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danaher Corporation

Danaher Corporation

2200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, 20037, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danaher.com
834/1000Good

Danaher is a leading global life sciences and diagnostics innovator, committed to accelerating the power of science and technology to improve human health. We partner with customers across the globe to help them solve their most complex challenges, architecting solution...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:50,163
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Asahi Kasei Bioprocess

Asahi Kasei Bioprocess

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danaher Corporation

Danaher Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asahi Kasei Bioprocess in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danaher Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Asahi Kasei Bioprocess (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asahi Kasei Bioprocess cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danaher Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danaher Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Asahi Kasei Bioprocess

Asahi Kasei Bioprocess

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danaher Corporation

Danaher Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess company and Danaher Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess and Danaher Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess and Danaher Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Asahi Kasei Bioprocess or Danaher Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Asahi Kasei Bioprocess or Danaher Corporation ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess and Danaher Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Asahi Kasei Bioprocess and Danaher Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2