Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPEASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE
VS
WärtsiläWärtsilä
ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE

ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE

47, Avenue d'orléans, Chartres, 28000, FR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.asahidia.eu/
737/1000Moderate

Recognized as a reference in superabrasives in Europe, Asahi Diamond Industrial Europe S.A.S. manufactures and sells diamond and cBN tools for grinding, sharpening, cutting and polishing in various business areas.

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Hiililaiturinkuja 2, Helsinki, 00180, FI

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wartsila.com
788/1000Fair

We enable sustainable societies through innovation in technology and services together with all our stakeholders – today and tomorrow. We emphasise innovation in sustainable technology and services to help our customers continuously improve environmental and economic p...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:16,129
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE

ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wärtsilä in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wärtsilä (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wärtsilä cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE

ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ASA1764258923.138696
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE or Wärtsilä ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE or Wärtsilä ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE and Wärtsilä, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ASAHI DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL EUROPE and Wärtsilä, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1