Comparison Overview
Artelia Canada

Artelia Canada
7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, Quebec, H3N 1X9, CA
Last Update: 25/02/2026
Une ingénierie multidisciplinaire, passionnée et indépendante Chez Artelia, nous croyons que chaque projet est une opportunité unique de créer des solutions pour une vie positive. De la conception de projets responsables à la mise en œuvre de solutions technologiques d...

Tata Technologies
25 Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Pune, 411057, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We're a global product engineering and digital services company focused on fulfilling our mission of helping the world drive, fly, build, and farm by enabling our customers to realize better products and deliver better experiences. We’re the strategic engineering partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Artelia Canada







Tata Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Artelia Canada in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Artelia Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Artelia Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Artelia Canada

Tata Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.