Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Arrow ECS Finland OyArrow ECS Finland Oy
VS
IndraIndra
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Lars Sonckin kaari 16, Espoo, 02600, FI

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Arrow ECS on teknologiayritys, joka tuo markkinoille innovatiivisia IT-ratkaisuja selkeyttämään monimutkaisia liiketoimintahaasteita. Toimitamme lisäarvoa tuottavaa jakelu-, konsultointi- ja kanavapalvelua johtaville teknologiavalmistajille ja kanavakumppaneille. Autamm...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Indra

Indra

Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES

Last Update: 01/07/2026

View Profile
684/1000Weak

Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:39,371
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Indra

Indra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow ECS Finland Oy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Indra has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Arrow ECS Finland Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow ECS Finland Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Indra

Indra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IND1782923647

FAQ

Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Indra company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Indra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Indra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Arrow ECS Finland Oy or Indra ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Arrow ECS Finland Oy or Indra ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Indra, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Indra, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9