Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Arrow ECS Finland OyArrow ECS Finland Oy
VS
Hexaware TechnologiesHexaware Technologies
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Lars Sonckin kaari 16, Espoo, 02600, FI

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Arrow ECS on teknologiayritys, joka tuo markkinoille innovatiivisia IT-ratkaisuja selkeyttämään monimutkaisia liiketoimintahaasteita. Toimitamme lisäarvoa tuottavaa jakelu-, konsultointi- ja kanavapalvelua johtaville teknologiavalmistajille ja kanavakumppaneille. Autamm...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hexaware Technologies

Hexaware Technologies

#1, Sector III, Millennium Business Park,, Navi Mumbai, 400710, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hexaware.com
762/1000Fair

At Hexaware, we're not just a global technology and business process services company; we're a community of 31,600+ Hexawarians dedicated to one singular purpose: creating smiles through the power of great people and technology. With a presence in 58 offices across 28 c...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:34,837
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hexaware Technologies

Hexaware Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow ECS Finland Oy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hexaware Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Arrow ECS Finland Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow ECS Finland Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hexaware Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hexaware Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hexaware Technologies

Hexaware Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy company and Hexaware Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Hexaware Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Hexaware Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Arrow ECS Finland Oy or Hexaware Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Arrow ECS Finland Oy or Hexaware Technologies ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Hexaware Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Arrow ECS Finland Oy and Hexaware Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3