Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisseFederal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse
VS
CONICETCONICET
Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse

Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse

Guisanplatz 1, Bern, undefined, 3003, CH

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ar.admin.ch/de
764/1000Fair

armasuisse is the Swiss federal government's centre of excellence for the procurement of technologically complex systems and materials, for security technologies and quality management and for DDPS real estate. A capable and customer-focused staff of 700 people througho...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:737
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CONICET

CONICET

Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA, C1425FQB, AR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conicet.gov.ar
782/1000Fair

El Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) es el principal organismo dedicado a la promoción de la ciencia y la tecnología en la Argentina. Su actividad se desarrolla en cuatro grandes áreas: • Ciencias agrarias, ingeniería y de materiales •...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,752
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse

Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CONICET

CONICET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CONICET in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CONICET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CONICET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse

Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CONICET

CONICET

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse company and CONICET company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse or CONICET ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse or CONICET ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse and CONICET, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Federal Office for Defence Procurement armasuisse and CONICET, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1