Comparison Overview
Arlanis Reply UK

Arlanis Reply UK
Nova South, 160 Victoria Street, Westminster, SW1E 5LB, GB
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Arlanis Reply is the Reply Group company specializing in Salesforce implementations. Our experience extends not just to the delivery of a single instance of Core Salesforce, but to complex environments which span the entire Salesforce stack (Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, ...

TIVIT
Avenida das Nações Unidas 8501, São Paulo, 05425-070, BR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
TIVIT is a Brazil-based multinational company that offers enterprise-level digital solutions, and operates in ten countries in Latin America. We help our clients develop their businesses by offering industry-leading digital solutions divided into four main categories: D...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Arlanis Reply UK







TIVIT






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Arlanis Reply UK in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TIVIT in 2026.
Incident History - Arlanis Reply UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Arlanis Reply UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TIVIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TIVIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Arlanis Reply UK

TIVIT
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.