Comparison Overview
Arkema Coatings

Arkema Coatings
51 Esplanade du Général de Gaulle CS 10478, Paris La Défense cedex, 92907, FR
Last Update: 13/02/2026
Arkema Coating Solutions is a leading supplier of high-performance specialty resins and additives, for high solids, waterborne, UV-LED-EB, and polyester powder technologies offering a unique portfolio of more sustainable solutions for fast-growing coating applications, ...

Linde
43 Church Street West, Woking, GU21 6HT, GB
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Linde is a leading global industrial gases and engineering company with 2025 sales of $34 billion. We live our mission of making our world more productive every day by providing high-quality solutions, technologies and services which are making our customers more succes...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Arkema Coatings







Linde






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Arkema Coatings in 2026.
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Linde in 2026.
Incident History - Arkema Coatings (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Arkema Coatings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Linde (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Linde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Arkema Coatings

Linde
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.