Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Argyll Environmental LtdArgyll Environmental Ltd
VS
Environment AgencyEnvironment Agency
Argyll Environmental Ltd

Argyll Environmental Ltd

1st Floor, Brighton, undefined, BN1 3XF, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

We are a specialist risk management consultancy with a highly talented and extensively qualified team based in the heart of Brighton. We offer a variety of environmental due diligence and risk assessment services that provide solutions to support transactions, redevelop...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Environment Agency

Environment Agency

Horizon House, Bristol, BS1 5AH, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

We are the Environment Agency. We are the biggest and most wide-ranging environmental regulator in Europe. We work with businesses and communities to protect and improve the environment, for people and wildlife. And the need for our work is becoming ever more important....

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:10,113
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Argyll Environmental Ltd

Argyll Environmental Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Environment Agency

Environment Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Argyll Environmental Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Environment Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Argyll Environmental Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Argyll Environmental Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Environment Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Environment Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Argyll Environmental Ltd

Argyll Environmental Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Environment Agency

Environment Agency

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Environment Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Environment Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Environment Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Argyll Environmental Ltd or Environment Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Argyll Environmental Ltd or Environment Agency ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Environment Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Environment Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA