Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Argyll Environmental LtdArgyll Environmental Ltd
VS
Bureau Veritas GroupBureau Veritas Group
Argyll Environmental Ltd

Argyll Environmental Ltd

1st Floor, Brighton, undefined, BN1 3XF, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

We are a specialist risk management consultancy with a highly talented and extensively qualified team based in the heart of Brighton. We offer a variety of environmental due diligence and risk assessment services that provide solutions to support transactions, redevelop...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bureau Veritas Group

Bureau Veritas Group

4 Place des Saisons, Paris, 92400, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bureauveritas.com
785/1000Fair

Bureau Veritas is a world leader in Testing, Inspection and Certification. Our mission is at the heart of key challenges: quality, health and safety, environmental protection and social responsibility. Through our wide range of expertise, impartiality and independence, ...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:54,810
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Argyll Environmental Ltd

Argyll Environmental Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bureau Veritas Group

Bureau Veritas Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Argyll Environmental Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bureau Veritas Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Argyll Environmental Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Argyll Environmental Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bureau Veritas Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bureau Veritas Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Argyll Environmental Ltd

Argyll Environmental Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bureau Veritas Group

Bureau Veritas Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BUR1327111122

FAQ

Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Bureau Veritas Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Bureau Veritas Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Argyll Environmental Ltd or Bureau Veritas Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Argyll Environmental Ltd or Bureau Veritas Group ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Bureau Veritas Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Argyll Environmental Ltd and Bureau Veritas Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2