Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Arctic Wolf

Arctic Wolf Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

arcticwolf.com

Every year new technologies, vendors, and solutions emerge—yet despite this constant innovation, high-profile breaches are all over the headlines. In response, organizations have scrambled to develop a better security posture, but the dizzying array of options leaves resource-constrained IT and security leaders wondering how to proceed. Enter Arctic Wolf, the market leader in Security Operations. Using the cloud-native Arctic Wolf Aurora Platform, we help organizations end cyber risk by providing security operations as a concierge service. Arctic Wolf solutions include Arctic Wolf® Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Managed Risk, Managed Security Awareness, and Incident Response; each delivered by our Concierge Delivery Model.


Arctic Wolf A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Arctic Wolf
Company Information
Website:https://arcticwolf.com
Employees number:3,325
Number of followers:133,314
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:arcticwolf.com
Arctic Wolf Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
Arctic WolfComputer and Network Security
Updated:
02/07/2026
677/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Arctic Wolf Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Arctic WolfComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Arctic Wolf
Arctic WolfWeak
Current Score
677B (WEAK)
01000
3 incidents
-4.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
677Before Incident
JUNE 2026
680Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jun 2026Arctic Wolf
Citrix, Kontron, The Gentlemen RaaS Victims and Anubis Ransomware Victims: Ransomware Groups Turn to Citrix Bleed 2, BYOVD, and Supply Chain Credentials

Anubis Ransomware Exploits Citrix Bleed 2 in Targeted Attacks Across Critical Sectors

675After Incident
CRITICAL-5
CITGUIKONARC1783031139
Anubis Ransomware Exploits Citrix Bleed 2 in Targeted Attacks Across Critical Sectors Threat actors linked to the Anubis ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation are actively exploiting CVE-2025-5777 (Citrix Bleed 2), a critical vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway, to gain initial access to victim networks. According to a report by Arctic Wolf, attackers leverage legitimate Remote Management and Monitoring (RMM) tools including ScreenConnect, Zoho Assist, MeshAgent, Remotely, UltraVNC, and Total Software Deployment to blend in with normal IT activity while maintaining persistent control. Anubis, a rebrand of the Sphinx ransomware, emerged in late 2024 and was formally announced on the RAMP underground forum in February 2025. Since then, the group has claimed 91 victims on its data leak site, with 11 reported in June 2026 alone. Targeted sectors include healthcare, business services, manufacturing, technology, and financial services, with over 50% of victims based in the U.S., followed by the U.K., Australia, France, and Canada. The group employs aggressive tactics, including an irreversible data-wiping feature that reduces files to 0 KB regardless of ransom payment, increasing pressure on victims. Affiliates receive 80% of ransom payments, a lucrative incentive that has fueled the operation’s growth. Beyond Citrix Bleed 2, Anubis actors have also used stolen VPN credentials potentially sourced from initial access brokers, credential stuffing, or info-stealer malware to breach networks via Cisco AnyConnect VPNs, particularly through hosting providers like AS20473 (The Constant Company) and AS55286 (ServerMania). Once inside, attackers move laterally using RDP and PsExec, deploy RMM tools for persistence, and exfiltrate data via Cloudflare Tunnels, S3 Browser, rclone, s5cmd, WinSCP, and PuTTY. They also disable security defenses, including Windows Defender and Sophos, and manipulate logs to hinder forensic analysis. In some cases, the ransomware encryptor is deleted post-execution, further complicating detection. ### The Gentlemen RaaS and Zero-Day Exploits Separately, Kaspersky detailed The Gentlemen RaaS, which exploits known vulnerabilities and weak credentials to deploy a Go-based backdoor for remote command execution. The malware collects system data, exfiltrates it to 81.177.215[.]15:9443, and can establish a SOCKS proxy for network pivoting. The group has also weaponized a zero-day vulnerability in ktapi.sys, a Kontron driver, to bypass Windows security protections and terminate processes from Microsoft, ESET, Palo Alto Networks, and SentinelOne. ### VECT and TeamPCP’s Supply Chain-Ransomware Hybrid A Sophos investigation revealed a partnership between VECT and TeamPCP, announced in March 2026, combining supply chain credential theft with ransomware deployment. TeamPCP, previously operating as CipherForce, rebranded after listing six victims in February 2026. However, VECT’s encryptor contains critical flaws, destroying files larger than 128 KB instead of encrypting them a defect TeamPCP claims it never used in attacks. The alliance represents a shift toward industrialized ransomware deployment, lowering the barrier for cybercriminals by merging large-scale supply chain attacks with mature RaaS operations. Despite technical shortcomings, the model poses a growing threat to enterprises.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData exfiltrationExtortion
IMPACT
Citrix NetScaler ADC and GatewayVPN systems (Cisco AnyConnect)Windows systemsOperational Impact: Disruption of services, lateral movement within networks, disabling of security defenses
DATA BREACH
Personally identifiable informationPayment informationSensitive corporate dataSensitivity Of Data: High
MAY 2026
679Before Incident
APRIL 2026
678Before Incident
MARCH 2026
676Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
674Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
671Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
673Before Incident
Vulnerability
12 Dec 2025Arctic Wolf
Fortinet and Arctic Wolf: Attackers are exploiting auth bypass vulnerability on FortiGate firewalls (CVE-2025-59718)

Exploitation of CVE-2025-59718 to Bypass Authentication on Fortinet FortiGate Firewalls

669After Incident
LOW-4
FORARC1765986943
Fortinet Firewall Vulnerabilities Exploited in Active Attacks Attackers are actively exploiting a recently disclosed vulnerability (CVE-2025-59718) to bypass authentication on Fortinet’s FortiGate firewalls, enabling them to export sensitive system configuration files. Arctic Wolf researchers reported the campaign on Tuesday, warning that stolen configurations may contain network infrastructure details, security policies, and encrypted credentials—data that could facilitate future attacks. The vulnerability, along with a related flaw (CVE-2025-59719), stems from improper cryptographic signature verification. Both can be exploited by sending a crafted SAML response to a vulnerable device, tricking it into granting unauthorized access. CVE-2025-59718 affects FortiOS (FortiGate), FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager, while CVE-2025-59719 impacts FortiWeb. Fortinet disclosed the vulnerabilities on December 9, 2025, and released patches, advising customers to upgrade or disable the FortiCloud SSO login feature if enabled. The flaw is not active by default but can be triggered if administrators register devices to FortiCare without disabling the "Allow administrative login using FortiCloud SSO" option. Arctic Wolf observed intrusions beginning December 12, with attackers using malicious SSO logins—primarily targeting the admin account—before exfiltrating configurations via the GUI. The attacks originated from IP addresses linked to multiple hosting providers. CISA has added CVE-2025-59718 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, mandating U.S. federal agencies to remediate the flaw by December 23, 2025. Organizations using affected Fortinet products are advised to check logs for suspicious activity and reset compromised credentials if breaches are detected.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Authentication Bypass
MOTIVATION
Data Exfiltration, Credential Harvesting
IMPACT
Data Compromised: System configuration files (network/infrastructure details, firewall policies, encrypted/hashed passwords)Systems Affected: FortiGate firewalls, FortiProxy, FortiSwitchManager, FortiWebOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to network infrastructureBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to security breachIdentity Theft Risk: High (if hashed credentials are cracked)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: System configuration files (network/infrastructure details, firewall policies, encrypted/hashed passwords)Sensitivity Of Data: High (contains hashed credentials and network details)Data Exfiltration: Yes (configuration files exported to attacker-controlled IPs)Data Encryption: Data was encrypted/hashed (but may be cracked)File Types Exposed: Configuration files
NOVEMBER 2025
673Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
671Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
765Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
765Before Incident
JUNE 2025
765Before Incident
Ransomware
16 Jun 2025Arctic Wolf
Sophos, Barracuda Networks and Arctic Wolf: Black Hat: Organizations Face Multiple Ransomware Hits

Ransomware Resurgence: Barracuda Report Reveals Alarming Trends at Black Hat USA 2025

662After Incident
HIGH-103
SOPBARARC1768969865
Ransomware Resurgence: Barracuda Report Reveals Alarming Trends at Black Hat USA 2025 At Black Hat USA 2025, Barracuda Networks unveiled a stark report on ransomware’s evolving threat landscape, revealing that 31% of victims were attacked multiple times in the past year a trend driven by fragmented security defenses and persistent gaps in protection. The findings, based on a survey of 2,000 IT and security decision-makers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, paint a troubling picture of modern cyber threats. Key takeaways from the report include: - 57% of organizations suffered a successful ransomware attack in the last 12 months. - 71% of those hit by email breaches were also targeted by ransomware, underscoring email as a primary attack vector. - Only 32% of victims paid a ransom, and just half of those recovered all their data. - Fragmented security tools and insufficient coverage in critical areas particularly email security left organizations vulnerable to repeat attacks. Adam Khan, Barracuda’s VP of global security operations, highlighted that less than half of ransomware victims had implemented email security solutions, despite email being a leading entry point. The report also noted that ransomware attacks are now multi-dimensional, combining data encryption, theft, and secondary payloads for maximum disruption. Beyond financial losses, attacks inflicted reputational damage (41%), lost business opportunities (25%), and pressure on partners and employees (22%), signaling a shift toward broader operational and psychological impact. --- Sophos and Rubrik Partner to Strengthen Microsoft 365 Resilience In a separate announcement, Rubrik and Sophos unveiled a strategic partnership to deliver the first MDR-optimized Microsoft 365 backup and recovery solution, integrated into Sophos Central. The offering aims to combat ransomware, account compromise, and data loss across SharePoint, Exchange, OneDrive, and Teams by unifying threat detection and recovery in a single workflow. Raja Patel, Sophos’ chief product officer, emphasized the solution’s ability to simplify operations for partners, enabling automated recovery triggered by MDR alerts and creating new revenue streams. Rubrik CEO Bipul Sinha noted the partnership’s focus on AI-driven threats, stressing the need for rapid recovery capabilities in an era of sophisticated breaches. --- Darktrace’s 2025 Mid-Year Retrospective: AI-Powered Threats and SaaS Exploitation Darktrace’s retrospective of H1 2025 highlighted the growing use of AI by threat actors, including highly convincing phishing emails and automated campaigns at unprecedented scale. The report also flagged SaaS exploitation as a critical concern, citing lack of visibility and business-level controls in cloud environments. Nathaniel Jones, Darktrace’s VP of security and AI strategy, warned that user vigilance alone is insufficient, advocating for AI-driven defense systems to counter advanced threats like Blind Eagle. While law enforcement collaborations such as the takedown of Lumma Stealer show progress, the report cautioned that new threats will continue to emerge, with AI adoption expected to expand into deepfakes, malware development, and tooling. --- Additional Black Hat Announcements Other notable developments included: - Arctic Wolf, Flashpoint, and Cyera unveiling new threat intelligence and data security initiatives. - Industry-wide discussions on AI’s dual role in both offensive and defensive cyber operations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
IMPACT
Brand Reputation Impact: 41%

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Arctic Wolf ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Arctic Wolf's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Arctic Wolf ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Arctic Wolf's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
Arctic Wolf Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo