Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BNY ArcherBNY Archer
VS
Prudential plcPrudential plc
BNY Archer

BNY Archer

801 Cassatt Road, Berwyn, PA, 19312, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.archerims.com
755/1000Fair

Archer is a technology-enabled service provider that delivers outsourced operations to help investment managers grow through product innovation and cost management. With fully integrated, robust technology, Archer enables investment managers to maintain their proven and...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:177
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prudential plc

Prudential plc

13/F, One International Finance Centre, 1 Habour View Street, Central, HK

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

We are Prudential. For Every Life, For Every Future. Prudential provides life and health insurance and asset management in Greater China, ASEAN, India and Africa. Prudential’s mission is to be the most trusted partner and protector for this generation and generations ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:55,792
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BNY Archer

BNY Archer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prudential plc

Prudential plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNY Archer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BNY Archer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNY Archer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prudential plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BNY Archer

BNY Archer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prudential plc

Prudential plc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BNY Archer company and Prudential plc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BNY Archer and Prudential plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BNY Archer and Prudential plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BNY Archer or Prudential plc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BNY Archer or Prudential plc ?
Between BNY Archer and Prudential plc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BNY Archer and Prudential plc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2