Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ArcelorMittal ProjectsArcelorMittal Projects
VS
First Quantum MineralsFirst Quantum Minerals
ArcelorMittal Projects

ArcelorMittal Projects

Mannesmannweg 5, Heijningen, 4794SL, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

We provide complete, customised & sustainable steel solutions and services via 3 specialised and project-related business lines: Foundation Solutions, Energy Projects and Sheet Metal Processing. At Projects, regional presence and knowledge are combined with worldwide s...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:161
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals

8th Floor – 543 Granville Street, Canada V6C 1X8, CA

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is a global mining company producing copper and nickel, as well as gold and cobalt. Our growing portfolio of operations and projects spans four continents and employs around 20,000 people. We are well-known for our ‘can do’ attitude and spec...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:12,295
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ArcelorMittal Projects

ArcelorMittal Projects

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Projects in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Quantum Minerals in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ArcelorMittal Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArcelorMittal Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - First Quantum Minerals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Quantum Minerals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ArcelorMittal Projects

ArcelorMittal Projects

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects and First Quantum Minerals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects and First Quantum Minerals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ArcelorMittal Projects or First Quantum Minerals ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ArcelorMittal Projects or First Quantum Minerals ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects and First Quantum Minerals, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects and First Quantum Minerals, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA