Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ArcelorMittal Projects UkraineArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine
VS
Norsk HydroNorsk Hydro
ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine

ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine

Kyiv, 01001, UA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

ArcelorMittal – провідна у світі металургійна компанія. Керуючись філософією безпечного і сталого виробництва сталі, вона є провідним постачальником якісної сталевої продукції на всіх основних ринках. ArcelorMittal присутній в 60 країнах і має виробничі потужності в 19 ...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Drammensveien 264, Oslo, 0283, NO

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.hydro.com
666/1000Weak

Hydro is a leading industrial company that builds businesses and partnerships for a more sustainable future. We develop industries that matter to people and society. Since 1905, Hydro has turned natural resources into valuable products for people and businesses, creati...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:13,369
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine

ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norsk Hydro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Norsk Hydro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norsk Hydro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine

ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Norsk Hydro

Norsk Hydro

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOR442050724
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR416051424
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR5602456091025

FAQ

Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine company and Norsk Hydro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine and Norsk Hydro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine or Norsk Hydro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine or Norsk Hydro ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ArcelorMittal Projects Ukraine and Norsk Hydro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96795
SUMMARY

Horilla is an HR and CRM software. Prior to 2.0.0, HorillaListView.export_data in horilla_views/generic/cbv/views.py accepts an authenticated user's columns POST parameter, takes field_tuple[1], interpolates it into dynamic_fn_str as Python source, and passes the generated function definition to exec(). A crafted string that remains valid under ast.literal_eval can inject Python syntax into a default argument evaluated during function definition, allowing arbitrary operating-system commands to execute with the application process privileges, including root privileges in the shipped Docker image. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86066
SUMMARY

Horilla is an HR and CRM software. Prior to 2.0.0, approve_validate_attendance_request at /attendance/approve-validate-attendance-request/ changes attendance_validated, is_validate_request_approved, approved_by, and related pending-request state through an HTTP GET before calling attendance.save(), so Django does not require CSRF validation for the action. An unauthenticated attacker can cause a logged-in manager with attendance.change_attendance to make a top-level request that carries the manager's SameSite=Lax session cookie, silently approving attendance with the victim's privileges and attributing the approval to the victim in the audit trail. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-57449
SUMMARY

Actual is a local-first personal finance tool. Prior to 26.7.0, Actual Sync Server's CORS proxy is intended to let authenticated users fetch resources only from repositories listed in the official plugin allowlist. When `ACTUAL_GITHUB_TOKEN` is configured, the proxy automatically attaches the server's GitHub token to GitHub requests. The GitHub API allowlist check uses a raw `startsWith()` prefix test for `/repos/{owner}/{repo}` without requiring a path boundary after the repository name. If an allowlisted public plugin repository is `https://github.com/acme/plugin`, the proxy also accepts GitHub API URLs. Those URLs are outside the allowlisted repository but still pass because their API path starts with `/repos/acme/plugin`. The proxy then forwards the request with the server's `ACTUAL_GITHUB_TOKEN`, allowing any authenticated Actual user to read private GitHub resources reachable by that token. Version 26.7.0 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92842
SUMMARY

The convert.base64-encode, convert.quoted-printable-encode and convert.quoted-printable-decode stream filters accept a line-break-chars option whose length is tracked separately from the string itself. The filter constructors duplicate the value with pestrdup(), which stops at the first NUL byte, while keeping the original length. When the filter later emits a line break it copies the recorded length out of the truncated allocation, reading past its end and placing adjacent heap bytes into the filter output.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-91768
SUMMARY

The IPv6 branch of the FastCGI client access check compares only the first 12 bytes of a 16-byte IPv6 address, so listen.allowed_clients matches on a /96 prefix instead of the exact address. An attacker who can source an address sharing the first 96 bits with an allowed one passes the check and reaches the FastCGI endpoint.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8