Comparison Overview
ArcelorMittal Ostrava

ArcelorMittal Ostrava
Vratimovská 689, Ostrava-Kunčice, undefined, 702 02, CZ
Last Update: 19/12/2025
Říká se, že vše kolem nás je buďto z oceli, nebo bylo vyrobeno ocelovým přístrojem. A není to nadsázka - ocel je skutečně nejdůležitějším materiálem v našich životech. Provází nás každý den a život bez ní si lze jen těžko představit. Ocel je šetrná k přírodě, protože je...

JSW Steel
Bandra Kurla Complex,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 051
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Over the last 35 years, we have partnered the country in its journey to self-reliance, by embracing sustainability, adopting cutting-edge technology and having innovation and R&D initiatives at the heart of our culture. From humble beginnings with a single plant in 1982...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ArcelorMittal Ostrava







JSW Steel






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Ostrava in 2026.
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JSW Steel in 2026.
Incident History - ArcelorMittal Ostrava (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ArcelorMittal Ostrava cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - JSW Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JSW Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ArcelorMittal Ostrava

JSW Steel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.