Comparison Overview
ArcelorMittal Belgium

ArcelorMittal Belgium
John Kennedylaan 51, 9042 Ghent, undefined, undefined, BE
Last Update: 05/01/2026
ArcelorMittal Belgium is part of the ArcelorMittal Group, a leading steel and mining company. At our plants in Gent, Geel, Genk and Liège, we convert raw materials into steel products with high added value. Every year, we ship around 6 million tons of flat carbon steel ...

DS Smith
1 Paddington Square, Level 3, LONDON, GB, W2 1DL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
DS Smith provides innovative packaging solutions, paper products and recycling services with a commitment to sustainability and a circular economy. Our core purpose is to Redefine Packaging for a Changing World, and our expert teams work closely with like-minded partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ArcelorMittal Belgium







DS Smith






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Belgium in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DS Smith in 2026.
Incident History - ArcelorMittal Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ArcelorMittal Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DS Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DS Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ArcelorMittal Belgium

DS Smith
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.