Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAMArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM
VS
First Quantum MineralsFirst Quantum Minerals
ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM

ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM

Avenida Carandaí - 1115, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 3013915, BR

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile

Being the largest long and drawn steels in Brazil, we are enabled to offer the market the most complete portfolio of products and solutions for civil construction, industry and agribusiness.

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:1,531
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals

8th Floor – 543 Granville Street, Canada V6C 1X8, CA

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is a global mining company producing copper and nickel, as well as gold and cobalt. Our growing portfolio of operations and projects spans four continents and employs around 20,000 people. We are well-known for our ‘can do’ attitude and spec...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:12,295
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM

ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Quantum Minerals in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - First Quantum Minerals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Quantum Minerals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM

ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM company and First Quantum Minerals company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM and First Quantum Minerals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM and First Quantum Minerals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM or First Quantum Minerals ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM or First Quantum Minerals ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM and First Quantum Minerals, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ArcelorMittal Long Carbon LATAM and First Quantum Minerals, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9