Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Arca Continental LindleyArca Continental Lindley
VS
Restaurant AssociatesRestaurant Associates
Arca Continental Lindley

Arca Continental Lindley

Av. Javier Prado Este 6210, La Molina, La Molina, Perú, PE, Lima 25

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Somos el embotellador autorizado The Coca-Cola Company en el Perú y formamos parte de Arca Continental, uno de los embotelladores más importantes del mundo. Contamos con uno de los modelos industriales más avanzados, así como la red comercial y de distribución más grand...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2,236
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Restaurant Associates

Restaurant Associates

132 W 31st Street, Suite 601, New York, New York, US, 10001

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Restaurant Associates is a chef-driven hospitality company known for elevating culinary and brand experiences for our clients and guests across the country. Our lines of business include restaurants, workplace, higher education, cultural centers, and event catering. ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,314
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Arca Continental Lindley

Arca Continental Lindley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Restaurant Associates

Restaurant Associates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arca Continental Lindley in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Restaurant Associates in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Arca Continental Lindley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arca Continental Lindley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Restaurant Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restaurant Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Arca Continental Lindley

Arca Continental Lindley

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Restaurant Associates

Restaurant Associates

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley company and Restaurant Associates company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley and Restaurant Associates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley and Restaurant Associates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Arca Continental Lindley or Restaurant Associates ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Arca Continental Lindley or Restaurant Associates ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley and Restaurant Associates, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Arca Continental Lindley and Restaurant Associates, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA