Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Arc53

Arc53 Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

arc53.com

Transform your business with Arc53, leaders in leveraging AI and ML to redefine how data is interacted with and utilised. Founded in 2019 and headquartered in Edinburgh, our approach combines cutting-edge technology with a remote-first philosophy. We deliver tailored AI solutions that enhance data utilisation and decision-making.


Arc53 A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Arc53
Company Information
Website:https://arc53.com
Employees number:4
Number of followers:155
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:arc53.com
Arc53 Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
Arc53IT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
20/04/2026
748/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Arc53 Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Arc53IT Services and IT Consulting
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Arc53
Arc53Moderate
Current Score
748Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
-1 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
749Before Incident
JULY 2026
749Before Incident
JUNE 2026
748Before Incident
MAY 2026
748Before Incident
APRIL 2026
749Before Incident
Vulnerability
20 Apr 2026Arc53
Anthropic, Flowise, DocsGPT and IBM: Critical Vulnerability In Flowise Allows Remote Command Execution Via MCP Adapters

Critical AI Framework Vulnerability Exposes Millions to Remote Code Execution

748After Incident
CRITICAL-1
ANTARCFLOIBM1776659058
Critical AI Framework Vulnerability Exposes Millions to Remote Code Execution Researchers at OX Security have uncovered a severe architectural flaw in the Model Context Protocol (MCP), a communication standard developed by Anthropic and embedded in AI frameworks across Python, TypeScript, Java, and Rust. The vulnerability enables remote code execution (RCE), exposing sensitive data including API keys, internal databases, and chat histories across the AI supply chain. The flaw affects Flowise, a widely used open-source AI workflow builder, and extends to over 200,000 vulnerable instances, with 150 million downloads and 7,000 publicly accessible servers at risk. During testing, OX Security successfully executed live commands on six production platforms, demonstrating the flaw’s real-world impact. Key Exploitation Vectors Identified: - Unauthenticated UI injection in major AI frameworks. - Hardening bypasses in "protected" environments like Flowise. - Zero-click prompt injection in AI IDEs (e.g., Windsurf, Cursor). - Malicious MCP server distribution, with 9 out of 11 registries compromised in testing. At least ten CVEs have been issued, covering critical vulnerabilities in platforms such as LiteLLM, LangChain, GPT Researcher, DocsGPT, and IBM’s LangFlow. Despite OX Security’s recommendations for root-level patches, Anthropic declined to implement protocol-wide fixes, describing the behavior as "expected." The company did not oppose the public disclosure of the findings. The incident underscores systemic risks in AI infrastructure, with the flaw inherited by any developer building on MCP expanding the attack surface across the ecosystem. Security teams are advised to restrict public exposure of AI services, treat MCP inputs as untrusted, and enforce sandboxed environments. Patches for affected platforms are now available.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
API keysInternal databasesChat historiesSystems Affected: AI frameworks (Python, TypeScript, Java, Rust), Flowise, LiteLLM, LangChain, GPT Researcher, DocsGPT, IBM’s LangFlowOperational Impact: Exposure of sensitive data and potential remote code execution across AI supply chainBrand Reputation Impact: Systemic risks in AI infrastructure highlighted
DATA BREACH
API keysInternal databasesChat historiesSensitivity Of Data: High
MARCH 2026
749Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
749Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
749Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
749Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
749Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
749Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
749Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Arc53 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Arc53's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Arc53 ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Arc53's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?