Comparison Overview
ARC Pacific

ARC Pacific
N/A
Last Update: 03/02/2026
ARC Pacific was established in 2003 and has since then installed over 300 Inside Bake Ovens, Pin Ovens, Dry off Ovens, Washers and Regenerative Oxidizers for the Beer and Beverage Can Industry. As a result, ARC Pacific has become a global leader in supplying equipment a...

Sulzer
Neuwiesenstrasse 15, Winterthur, 8401, CH
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Sulzer is a global leader in critical applications for core infrastructure and processes for large essential industries around the world. We ensure the security, quality and durability of critical goods and services by supporting energy security, natural resource manage...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ARC Pacific







Sulzer






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ARC Pacific in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sulzer in 2026.
Incident History - ARC Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ARC Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sulzer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sulzer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ARC Pacific

Sulzer
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.