Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ARAUCO BrasilARAUCO Brasil
VS
KlabinKlabin
ARAUCO Brasil

ARAUCO Brasil

BR

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Há 45 anos inovamos e criamos tendências. Somos líderes em painéis de madeira nas Américas. Possuímos negócios em mais de 75 países e plantas industriais no Brasil, Chile, Argentina, Uruguai, Estados Unidos e Canadá. Nossa busca por soluções sustentáveis nos faz a ma...

NAICS:322
NAICS Definition:Paper Manufacturing
Employees:2,356
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Klabin

Klabin

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 3600, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04538-132

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.klabin.com.br
802/1000Good

Somos a maior produtora e exportadora de papéis para embalagens do Brasil, líderes nos mercados de embalagens de papelão ondulado, sacos industriais e papel-cartão e a única indústria do País a oferecer soluções em celuloses de fibra curta, fibra longa e fluff. Com mais...

NAICS:322
NAICS Definition:Paper Manufacturing
Employees:15,863
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ARAUCO Brasil

ARAUCO Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Klabin

Klabin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ARAUCO Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Klabin in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ARAUCO Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ARAUCO Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Klabin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Klabin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ARAUCO Brasil

ARAUCO Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Klabin

Klabin

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil company and Klabin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil and Klabin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil and Klabin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ARAUCO Brasil or Klabin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ARAUCO Brasil or Klabin ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil and Klabin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ARAUCO Brasil and Klabin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9