Comparison Overview
Arab Bank

Arab Bank
zaid bin shaker st., Amman, undefined, undefined, JO
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Established in 1930, Arab Bank headquartered in Amman, Jordan is the largest global Arab banking network with over 600 branches. Arab Bank is also present in key financial markets and centers such as London, Dubai, Singapore, Geneva, Paris, Sydney and Bahrain. Arab B...

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Building, Abu Dhabi, 939, AE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Established in 1985, ADCB places its focus on the UAE where it helps to make a significant contribution to the economy and community it serves. Our aspiration to be the number one bank of choice in the UAE is fueled by the strength and effectiveness of our strategy. Gui...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Arab Bank







Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Arab Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank in 2026.
Incident History - Arab Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Arab Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Arab Bank

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.