Comparison Overview
Aquent Cloud

Aquent Cloud
N/A
Last Update: 05/03/2026
The Cloud division of Aquent began in 2004 with a goal of providing web-based project management to creative and marketing organizations. We knew that in order to be successful we needed to provide a solutions that were easy to use, affordable, and fast to implement. Wi...

AlmavivA Experience
Avenida Rebouças 2728, São Paulo, 05402-500, BR
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Líder em transformação digital nos mercados de Customer Experience e Debt Collection na América Latina. Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e excelência operacional para entregar soluções completas que antecipam as necessidades dos nossos Clientes. São mais de 530 mil...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Aquent Cloud







AlmavivA Experience






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aquent Cloud in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Experience in 2026.
Incident History - Aquent Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aquent Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AlmavivA Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AlmavivA Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Aquent Cloud

AlmavivA Experience
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.