Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Aqua SecurityAqua Security
VS
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONSNETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Aqua Security

Aqua Security

800 District Ave, Burlington, 01803, US

Last Update: 03/06/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.aquasec.com
579/1000Very Poor

Aqua Security is the pioneer in securing containerized cloud native applications from development to production. Aqua's full lifecycle solution prevents attacks by enforcing pre-deployment hygiene and mitigates attacks in real time in production, reducing mean time to r...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:481
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Suwalska 19/1, Poznan, 60-461, PL

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.n-security.com
767/1000Fair

## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. O...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,471
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Aqua Security

Aqua Security

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Aqua Security has 548.15% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Aqua Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aqua Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Aqua Security

Aqua Security

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AQUEUR1775299151
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AQUEUR1775205235
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AQUUSEAMASALCIS1775046662
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Aqua Security company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Aqua Security and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Aqua Security and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Aqua Security or NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Aqua Security or NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS ?
Between Aqua Security and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Aqua Security and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA