Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AQD by Comply365AQD by Comply365
VS
DatabricksDatabricks
AQD by Comply365

AQD by Comply365

Wellington, NZ

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
753/1000Fair

AQD by Comply365 specialise in safety and risk management, working alongside highly regulated industries who keep people, products and information moving. Designed to capture vital safety, compliance and risk data in a consistent and connected way, AQD supports you to c...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Databricks

Databricks

160 Spear Street, 13th Floor, San Francisco, CA, US, 94105

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://databricks.com
795/1000Fair

Databricks is the Data and AI company. More than 20,000 organizations worldwide — including adidas, AT&T, Bayer, Block, Mastercard, Rivian, Unilever, and over 60% of the Fortune 500 — rely on Databricks to build and scale data and AI apps, analytics and agents. Headquar...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:14,231
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AQD by Comply365

AQD by Comply365

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Databricks

Databricks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AQD by Comply365 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Databricks in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AQD by Comply365 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AQD by Comply365 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Databricks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Databricks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AQD by Comply365

AQD by Comply365

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Databricks

Databricks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AQD by Comply365 company and Databricks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AQD by Comply365 and Databricks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AQD by Comply365 and Databricks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AQD by Comply365 or Databricks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AQD by Comply365 or Databricks ?
Between AQD by Comply365 and Databricks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AQD by Comply365 and Databricks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9