Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Applied Sciences - BrukerApplied Sciences - Bruker
VS
Københavns Universitet - University of CopenhagenKøbenhavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen
Applied Sciences - Bruker

Applied Sciences - Bruker

Fahrenheitstraße 4, Bremen, 28359, DE

Last Update: 24/11/2025

View Profile

Bruker designs analytical systems that deliver outstanding performance in food safety, forensics, environmental and industrial testing laboratories worldwide.

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

Nørregade 10, København K, DK, 1165

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ku.dk/
783/1000Fair

PRIVACY POLICY at the University of Copenhagen: https://informationssikkerhed.ku.dk/english/protection-of-information-privacy/privacy-policy/ With over 40,000 students and more than 9,000 employees, the University of Copenhagen is the largest institution of research an...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,969
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Applied Sciences - Bruker

Applied Sciences - Bruker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Sciences - Bruker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Applied Sciences - Bruker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Sciences - Bruker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Applied Sciences - Bruker

Applied Sciences - Bruker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker company and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Applied Sciences - Bruker or Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Applied Sciences - Bruker or Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Applied Sciences - Bruker and Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2