Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Applied Integrated Technologies, IncApplied Integrated Technologies, Inc
VS
Accenture in IndiaAccenture in India
Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc

Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc

6711 Columbia Gateway Dr., Suite 100, Columbia, 21046, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ait-i.com
736/1000Moderate

Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is dedicated to providing specialized services in the Cyber Security, Information Technology, Intel Analysis, and Linguist Services markets. By combining a strong background in systems engineering and IT solutions with experie...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Accenture in India

Accenture in India

IBC Knowledge Park,, Bengaluru, 560029, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
822/1000Good

Accenture is a global professional services company with leading capabilities in digital, cloud and security. Combining unmatched experience and specialized skills across more than 40 industries, we offer Strategy and Consulting, Interactive, Technology and Operations s...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:77,006
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc

Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Accenture in India

Accenture in India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accenture in India in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Accenture in India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture in India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc

Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
APP835082025
Accenture in India

Accenture in India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc company and Accenture in India company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc and Accenture in India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc and Accenture in India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc or Accenture in India ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc or Accenture in India ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc and Accenture in India, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Applied Integrated Technologies, Inc and Accenture in India, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA