Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Applied Energy Systems, Inc.Applied Energy Systems, Inc.
VS
AMDAMD
Applied Energy Systems, Inc.

Applied Energy Systems, Inc.

180 Quaker Lane, Malvern, 19355, US

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Applied Energy Systems (AES) is the premier gas delivery equipment and systems provider, engineering and delivering value for our customers through high purity and ultra high purity gas delivery and distribution equipment, services and applied solutions. With two indust...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:70
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AMD

AMD

2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, California, US, 95054

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amd.com
784/1000Fair

We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technology to enrich our industry, our communities, and the world. Our mission is to build great products that accelerate next-generation computing experiences – the building blocks for the data center, artificial intelli...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:56,967
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Applied Energy Systems, Inc.

Applied Energy Systems, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AMD

AMD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Energy Systems, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AMD has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Applied Energy Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Energy Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AMD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Applied Energy Systems, Inc.

Applied Energy Systems, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AMD

AMD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1781267811
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1932419101425
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SAL5592855100325

FAQ

Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. company and AMD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Applied Energy Systems, Inc. or AMD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Applied Energy Systems, Inc. or AMD ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. and AMD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Applied Energy Systems, Inc. and AMD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8