Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + BarApplebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar
VS
Taco BellTaco Bell
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

10 W Walnut St, Pasadena, 91103, US

Last Update: 27/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.applebees.com
705/1000Moderate

There's a lot to love about Applebee's! Founded more than four decades ago on the principles of exceptional value and family fun, Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill + Bar serves as America’s kitchen table. As one of the world’s largest casual dining brands, Applebee's provid...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:2,051
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

1 Glen Bell Way, Irvine, CA, US, 92618

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://tacobell.com
753/1000Fair

Taco Bell was born and raised in California and has been around since 1962. We went from selling everyone’s favorite Crunchy Tacos on the West Coast to a global brand with 8,200+ restaurants, 350 franchise organizations, that serve 42+ million fans each week around the ...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:83,616
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar has 50.98% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taco Bell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Taco Bell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taco Bell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
APP1787799775
🔒 Incident : Breach
APP1749622
Taco Bell

Taco Bell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NORKFCFOHTACHYA1769001351

FAQ

Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Taco Bell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Taco Bell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Taco Bell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar or Taco Bell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar or Taco Bell ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Taco Bell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Taco Bell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8