Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AppierAppier
VS
Tata Consultancy ServicesTata Consultancy Services
Appier

Appier

6F, No. 123, Songren Road, Taipei, 110, TW

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.appier.com
758/1000Fair

Appier is an AI-native SaaS company that empowers businesses to create value with cutting-edge AdTech and MarTech solutions. Guided by the vision of “Making AI Easy by Making Software Intelligent,” our mission is to help businesses turn AI into ROI. Founded in 2012, Ap...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:864
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services, Mumbai, 400001, IN

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tcs.com/
712/1000Moderate

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is the technology partner of choice for industry leading organizations worldwide. Since its inception in 1968, TCS has upheld the highest standards of innovation, engineering excellence, and customer service. It has set an aspiration to...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:717,299
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Appier

Appier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appier in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Tata Consultancy Services has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Appier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Consultancy Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Consultancy Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Appier

Appier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TAT1786447303
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
TAT1786447105

FAQ

Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Appier company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Appier and Tata Consultancy Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Appier and Tata Consultancy Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Appier or Tata Consultancy Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Appier or Tata Consultancy Services ?
Between Appier and Tata Consultancy Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Appier and Tata Consultancy Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA