Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AppierAppier
VS
inDriveinDrive
Appier

Appier

6F, No. 123, Songren Road, Taipei, 110, TW

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.appier.com
758/1000Fair

Appier is an AI-native SaaS company that empowers businesses to create value with cutting-edge AdTech and MarTech solutions. Guided by the vision of “Making AI Easy by Making Software Intelligent,” our mission is to help businesses turn AI into ROI. Founded in 2012, Ap...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:864
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
inDrive

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inDrive.com
782/1000Fair

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 400 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,675
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Appier

Appier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
inDrive

inDrive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appier in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Appier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Appier

Appier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
inDrive

inDrive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Appier company and inDrive company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Appier and inDrive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Appier and inDrive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Appier or inDrive ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Appier or inDrive ?
Between Appier and inDrive, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Appier and inDrive, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9