Comparison Overview
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)
서울특별시 강남구 테헤란로 82길 14(대치동, 청풍빌딩) 6층, 서울, KR
Last Update: 29/01/2026
[회사소개] 애피어는 인공지능(AI)을 활용해 비즈니스 의사결정을 강화하는 서비스형 소프트웨어(SaaS) 기업입니다. 애피어는 AI 보편화라는 비전을 토대로 2012년에 설립되었습니다. 애피어의 미션은 지능화 소프트웨어로 AI를 활용해 ROI를 높이는 것입니다. 현재 아시아태평양, 유럽, 미국에 17개의 지사를 운영하고 있으며, 도쿄증권거래소(Tokyo Stock Exchange)에 상장되었습니다. 더 자세한 정보는 애피어 공식 홈페이지 www.appier.com 에서 확인할 수...

GFT Technologies
Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE
Last Update: 20/09/2026
GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Appier (Korea)







GFT Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Appier (Korea) in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Appier (Korea) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Appier (Korea) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Appier (Korea)

GFT Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.