Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Appier (Korea)Appier (Korea)
VS
eClerxeClerx
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)

서울특별시 강남구 테헤란로 82길 14(대치동, 청풍빌딩) 6층, 서울, KR

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

[회사소개] 애피어는 인공지능(AI)을 활용해 비즈니스 의사결정을 강화하는 서비스형 소프트웨어(SaaS) 기업입니다. 애피어는 AI 보편화라는 비전을 토대로 2012년에 설립되었습니다. 애피어의 미션은 지능화 소프트웨어로 AI를 활용해 ROI를 높이는 것입니다. 현재 아시아태평양, 유럽, 미국에 17개의 지사를 운영하고 있으며, 도쿄증권거래소(Tokyo Stock Exchange)에 상장되었습니다. 더 자세한 정보는 애피어 공식 홈페이지 www.appier.com 에서 확인할 수...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
eClerx

eClerx

29 Bank Street, Fort, 1st Floor, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 023

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eclerx.com
758/1000Fair

eClerx is a productized services company, bringing together people, technology and domain expertise to amplify business results. Our mission is to set the benchmark for client service and success in our industry. Our vision is to be the innovation partner of choice for ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:19,162
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eClerx

eClerx

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appier (Korea) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClerx in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Appier (Korea) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appier (Korea) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eClerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
eClerx

eClerx

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and eClerx company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Appier (Korea) and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Appier (Korea) and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Appier (Korea) or eClerx ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Appier (Korea) or eClerx ?
Between Appier (Korea) and eClerx, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Appier (Korea) and eClerx, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-111369
SUMMARY

ClassroomIO through 1.0.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the PUT and DELETE /:lessonId lesson routes that allows any course member, including students, to modify lessons. Authenticated students can supply arbitrary lesson ids to change titles and stored HTML content or delete lessons in their course and in other courses and organizations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-111368
SUMMARY

ClassroomIO through 1.0.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the Hono API course submission routes that allows course tutors or admins to modify submissions in other courses. Attackers can supply their own course id with another course's submission UUID to PUT or DELETE handlers to overwrite answers, grades, feedback, and grading status or delete submissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-111367
SUMMARY

BillionMail through 4.9 contains a hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge unsubscribe and subscribe-confirm JWTs by computing the key from shipped configuration constants. Attackers can submit forged tokens to /api/unsubscribe, /api/unsubscribe_new, or /api/subscribe/confirm to deactivate any contact or force confirmed subscriptions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-111366
SUMMARY

cool-admin-midway through 8.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows department-limited admins to manage users outside their departments by supplying arbitrary user ids. Attackers holding sys:user:* permissions can call /admin/sys/user/info, update, or delete to read records, reset passwords and roles, or delete accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-111365
SUMMARY

cool-admin-midway through 8.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows non-superadmin admins to read, modify, or delete other admins' roles by supplying arbitrary role ids. Attackers holding ordinary sys:role permissions can call /admin/sys/role/info, update, or delete with another admin's role id to rewrite menu and department grants, changing other users' effective access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2