Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Appier (Korea)Appier (Korea)
VS
Diebold NixdorfDiebold Nixdorf
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)

서울특별시 강남구 테헤란로 82길 14(대치동, 청풍빌딩) 6층, 서울, KR

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

[회사소개] 애피어는 인공지능(AI)을 활용해 비즈니스 의사결정을 강화하는 서비스형 소프트웨어(SaaS) 기업입니다. 애피어는 AI 보편화라는 비전을 토대로 2012년에 설립되었습니다. 애피어의 미션은 지능화 소프트웨어로 AI를 활용해 ROI를 높이는 것입니다. 현재 아시아태평양, 유럽, 미국에 17개의 지사를 운영하고 있으며, 도쿄증권거래소(Tokyo Stock Exchange)에 상장되었습니다. 더 자세한 정보는 애피어 공식 홈페이지 www.appier.com 에서 확인할 수...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://DieboldNixdorf.com
681/1000Weak

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:20,251
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appier (Korea) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Appier (Korea) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appier (Korea) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Appier (Korea)

Appier (Korea)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIE1772015252
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DIE000081024
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DIE84429723

FAQ

Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Appier (Korea) company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Appier (Korea) and Diebold Nixdorf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Appier (Korea) and Diebold Nixdorf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Appier (Korea) or Diebold Nixdorf ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Appier (Korea) or Diebold Nixdorf ?
Between Appier (Korea) and Diebold Nixdorf, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Appier (Korea) and Diebold Nixdorf, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2