Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Apogem CapitalApogem Capital
VS
FactSetFactSet
Apogem Capital

Apogem Capital

299 Park Avenue, New York , 10171, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://apogemcapital.com/
755/1000Fair

Apogem Capital is a leading alternatives investment manager with decades of experience investing in the middle market. Apogem Capital was created by combining three leading middle market investment firms—GoldPoint Partners, Madison Capital Funding, and PA Capital—into...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:245
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FactSet

FactSet

43 Glover Ave, Norwalk, Connecticut, US, 06850

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.factset.com
718/1000Moderate

FactSet creates flexible, open data and software solutions for tens of thousands of investment professionals around the world, providing instant access to financial data and analytics that investors use to make crucial decisions. For 40 years, through market changes a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:14,830
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Apogem Capital

Apogem Capital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FactSet

FactSet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apogem Capital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

FactSet has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Apogem Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apogem Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FactSet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FactSet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Apogem Capital

Apogem Capital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FactSet

FactSet

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAC1775047945

FAQ

Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Apogem Capital company and FactSet company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Apogem Capital and FactSet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Apogem Capital and FactSet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Apogem Capital or FactSet ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Apogem Capital or FactSet ?
Between Apogem Capital and FactSet, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Apogem Capital and FactSet, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3