Comparison Overview
Apex America

Apex America
Rodríguez del Busto 4086, Córdoba, 5000, AR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
We were born and work to create the future we want to see. We are a leading Digital Customer Experience service company in Latin America. Apex America emerged out of the dream of two entrepreneurs from Córdoba, who wished to create a technological pole in their city. T...

Majorel
Luxembourg, LU
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Majorel has been acquired by TP allowing us to deliver even more exceptional services in more locations worldwide and on a greater scale than ever before. We deliver the most advanced, digitally-powered business services to help the world’s best brands streamline their...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Apex America







Majorel






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Apex America in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Majorel has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Apex America (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Apex America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Majorel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Majorel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Apex America

Majorel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.