Comparison Overview
apetito B.V.

apetito B.V.
Hanzepoort 23d, Oldenzaal, 7575 DB, NL
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Het beste eten & de beste service apetito is in 1958 opgericht en levert maaltijden en verwante diensten aan uiteenlopende zorginstellingen en particulieren. Welke eet- of woonsituatie het ook betreft, met passie en vernieuwingskracht staan wij graag voor u klaar met...

Compass Group
Compass House, Chertsey, KT16 9BQ, GB
Last Update: 17/04/2026
Compass Group is a global leader in food services operating in over 25 countries with around 590,000 employees worldwide and generating underlying revenues of over $46 billion for the 2025 fiscal year. Our vision is to be a world-class provider of contract food services...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

apetito B.V.







Compass Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for apetito B.V. in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Compass Group in 2026.
Incident History - apetito B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
apetito B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Compass Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Compass Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

apetito B.V.

Compass Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.
Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.